Inventory intelligence

Available now

See how much you have, what is at risk, and what needs action first.

Zerqano turns stock state, coverage pressure, and reorder logic into a working decision surface so teams can move from risk review into governed replenishment action.

Buyer problem

Teams need to know what inventory they really have, where risk is changing, and what action should move first.

Current posture

This solution is supported by current product proof and is actively marketed as a live capability.

In-product proof

What inventory intelligence software looks like in the current product.

The public story now moves straight into route-backed proof so the claim stays tied to how the workflow actually behaves.

North-star pages use current foundation routes as proof, not hypothetical product surfaces.

Inventory OpsInventory Workbench

Inventory pressure is reviewed with enough context to act confidently.

The workbench turns SKU-level stock pressure into a decision surface with coverage, reorder logic, and the route into downstream execution.

Coverage

18 days

Current stock, demand, and lead-time pressure combined.

Suggested order

240 units

Policy-aware quantity already framed for review.

Service level

95%

The recommendation keeps service expectations visible during review.

Workbench checks

top 2

Validate the reorder point against live demand pressure

Stable

The operator sees stock state, policy, and recommendation in one place.

Use supplier and document context before escalating quantity

Watch

The next action should reflect the real operating situation, not just the math.

Step 1

Stock context

Step 2

Demand context

Step 3

Recommendation

Step 4

Procurement handoff

Outcome

Inventory planning stops being a report and becomes a working screen for governed replenishment decisions.

Open Inventory Workbench

Problem framing

Why this workflow breaks today.

Inventory pressure is often discovered late, reviewed in separate tools, and handed off manually into procurement.

Inventory operations, replenishment teams, branch leaders, and planners managing daily stock decisions.

Stock risk is still discovered manually

Operators often notice the problem through floor checks, urgent messages, or stale reports instead of a ranked daily queue.

The planning case has to be rebuilt every day

Coverage, reorder policy, supplier timing, and demand context often live in different places when the team needs to act.

Execution handoff breaks the context

By the time the team moves from inventory review into procurement, the reason behind the action is already fragmented.

What exists now

  • - Show stock risk, coverage pressure, and reorder logic in one working surface.
  • - Rank the inventory issues that deserve action first instead of flooding teams with flat alerts.
  • - Connect inventory review directly to procurement, pricing, and document signals.
  • - Keep decision rationale visible through approval and execution.

Operational proof

  • - Built around command center and inventory workbench, not static reporting alone.
  • - Connects inventory state to demand, supplier, document, and pricing context.
  • - Supports role-aware decision flows for operators, analysts, and leadership.

Trust and explainability

  • - Inventory recommendations stay tied to the stock context, reorder logic, and next workflow instead of showing up as isolated alerts.
  • - The platform supports review and approval rather than blind automation, which matters when working capital is involved.
  • - Connected inventory decisions are easier to trust because demand, supplier, and document context can still be inspected.

Connected system

This workflow gets stronger because it is connected to the rest of ItemIQ.

01

Open the ranked daily queue of inventory issues.

02

Inspect stock context, service level, and reorder pressure in the workbench.

03

Route the reviewed action into procurement or related workflows.

04

Keep the decision linked to the original operating case.

Where it expands next

Expands into broader scenario simulation, deeper supplier recommendation, and more explainable revenue impact modeling.

FAQ

Questions teams ask during evaluation.

The emphasis is on reviewed action. Zerqano surfaces risk, shows what changed, and routes the operator into the workflow that resolves the issue.